Tip #961: Just Because Your Participants Like Your Training Doesn’t Mean It’s Effective

If your training participants like your training, that doesn’t necessarily mean that your training is resulting in effective learning that will have a positive impact on future behavior. They may just like you!

The effectiveness of a training program depends upon the decisions that the trainers make about what will be taught and how it will be taught.

I have used a proven training audit process that is intended to encourage the trainers to: (1) become conscious of the instructional decisions that they make and (2) actively participate in a collaborative process with the auditor to improve the quality of those decisions.

There are eight different methods to gather sufficient information to adequately evaluate a training program:

(1)     review all lesson plans and related materials prior to the audit;

(2)     speak with the trainers, prior to the audit and during training breaks as time permits, regarding their objectives, teaching decisions, concerns and recommendations

(3)     observe the training process and methodology;

(4)     observe the learning activities;

(5)     speak with the trainees, as time permits, regarding their perceptions of the content and process of training and their recommendations to retain or modify any portions of the training;

(6)     review the handout materials and any examinations;

(7)     review the examination results, if examinations are given; and

(8)     check out concerns and discuss possible modifications with the trainers to get the benefit of their perceptions and recommendations.

It is important to keep in mind that the trainers are professionals who must be treated with respect. They need to feel that the audit process will be reasonable and fair. It helps to check out all observations and assumptions with the trainers and provide opportunities for them to explain the rationale behind their instructional choices. It is best for all concerned if the auditor is positioned as a supportive peer coach rather than a stern judge.

For this reason, all audit recommendations and findings should also be discussed with the trainers prior to the issuance of any report. To the extent possible, the auditor should credit the trainers with authoring or proposing the recommendations. This enables them to retain their status as trainers concerned with providing optimal learning. In addition, their “co-author” attribution publicly and formally commits them to implementing the audit recommendations.

If this strikes your interest, please let me know in the comments below.

May your learning be sweet- and safe.


#training #trainingaudits #laurelandassociates #trainingimprovement #collaborativetrainingaudits


Related Posts

Training Mastery

Are you a new trainer? Feeling overwhelmed? Wondering how to start or what to do?

Would you like to get just-in-time answers to your pressing questions? How about a second pair of eyes and ears to give you useful feedback and validation?

If you need help, come to my weekly Zoom roundtable on the third Thursday of the month, from 11 AM to 11:30 AM CST, beginning on September 21, 2023.

View the full course schedule.


Two new virtual business workshops for Spring 2023

Presentation Skills: Learn to be informative and persuasive.
8:30-4:00 pm,  4/26/2023

Register here

Six Steps to Yes: Acquire instant influence in a virtual world.
8:30 – 12:30pm, 3/28/2023

Register here


It doesn’t have to be difficult to Deal with Difficult People.

In this course you will define the behavioral characteristics and underlying needs of difficult people, assess situations in which you effectively handled a difficult person, review five steps for handling difficult people Laurel & Associates now offers courses through Teachable. Learn at your own pace.

Share This Post