Tip #545: Is Docking Pay a Co-Investment in Training?

“Craft is common both to skill and deceit.” Winston Churchill

According to “Computerworld,” IBM apparently cut the salaries of certain members of their Global Technology Services group by 10% in September of this year. The stated reason? “Some managers and employees have not kept pace with acquiring the skills and expertise needed to address changing client needs, technology, and market requirements.”

The 10% salary cut was explained as a “co-investment in training,” despite the fact that IBM had traditionally paid employees for time spent in training.

This entire situation raises a number of questions and concerns for me.

  • Whose responsibility is it to see that managers and employees have the requisite knowledge and skills they need to perform their jobs?
  • Isn’t this something that should have been identified during performance evaluations and goal setting discussions?
  • Wouldn’t you think that conversations with clients, new technology and/or changing markets would have made the need for new knowledge or skills apparent to the employees and managers themselves?
  • Were the employees and managers aware that their expertise and skills were outdated?
  • Did they try to do something about that, but found that there were barriers beyond their control, such as lack of time for or access to the necessary training?
  • Since only “selected members” of the IBM Global Technology Services group were given this pay cut, does that mean that the other group members have successfully managed to keep their expertise and skills up to date?
  • If so, why were they successful while the “selected members” were unsuccessful?
  • Is it actually true that these “selected members” lack the necessary expertise and skills?
  • Was there documentation that objectively showed that their performance was unsatisfactory- and that their unsatisfactory performance was due to their inability to meet client needs in the current market and to use current technology?
  • Is this a mildly disguised attempt to prompt these particular staff to leave the company?

Other provisions would seem to indicate that this is really a form of pay for performance. The pay cut is only supposed to be in effect for six months. During that time, the employees are expected to devote one day each week “developing skills in key growth areas such as cloud, analytics, mobile and social.”

  • Since these “key growth areas” are continually changing and expanding, won’t all staff need this training?
  • This also begs the question, who will provide this training- or are the staff supposed to seek it out for themselves?
  • How will IBM determine that the selected staff members have satisfactorily attained the necessary knowledge and skills?
  • Are there specific observable performance measures the staff will have to meet?
  • Is there an assumption that, after staff complete the 23 workdays they are supposed to focus on learning and development, their skills will be where they need to be?

Obviously, I am not privy to the actual reasons for IBM’s decision and the provisions for its implementation. However, it brings me back to my first question. Isn’t it the responsibility of the organization to see that managers and employees have the requisite knowledge and skills they need to perform their jobs? And if that is the case, and I believe it is, then isn’t it incumbent upon the company to pay for the necessary training?

May your learning be sweet.


Related Posts

Manage Your Holiday Stress Before It Manages You!

Saturday, December 10th from 11 AM to 2:30 PM CST

Over the river to grandmother’s house- we have an idea in our mind about how the holiday should be. But planning, shopping, baking, wrapping gifts, and preparing the house all take a toll. It’s easy to become anxious, worried about creating a perfect, memorable holiday. It doesn’t matter if it’s Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, or some other winter holiday. There are traditions to keep, favorite foods to prepare, and decorations to put up. It’s exhausting.

Then there’s the actual day. You will want everyone to feel happy and get along, but you know that the stress of the day can easily result in overexcited and grumpy grandchildren and irritable adult children. You imagine that all the time and effort you put into creating a lovely day could end up being wasted and unappreciated.

Holidays are supposed to be a joyful time. Let us help you get clear about what is not worth worrying about- and give you practical coping strategies that will help you stay calm when things don’t go the way you want them to go.

Join us for this highly interactive half-day virtual workshop on how to Manage Your Holiday Stress Before It Manages You on Saturday, December 10th from 11 AM to 2:30 PM CST. Your investment is $120. We guarantee that you will have a much less stressful holiday.

It doesn’t have to be difficult to Deal with Difficult People.

In this course you will define the behavioral characteristics and underlying needs of difficult people, assess situations in which you effectively handled a difficult person, review five steps for handling difficult people Laurel & Associates now offers courses through Teachable. Learn at your own pace.
Popular Post

Share This Post